Results

  1. Home
  2. »
  3. Results

Academic Philosophy

Annual Performance Report Results

Each year, North Side Community School eagerly anticipates the Annual Performance Report from the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (MO DESE). This comprehensive evaluation serves as a valuable benchmark, assessing the school’s achievements and areas for improvement. In the spirit of continuous growth, this year marks a renewed commitment to enhancing educational outcomes. North Side Community School is dedicated to building upon the successes of the past and implementing strategic measures to achieve even greater milestones. With a collective focus on improvement, the school community is excited to embrace the challenges and opportunities presented by the forthcoming report, aiming to further elevate the quality of education provided to its students.

2024 APR Results

2023 APR Results

2022 APR Results

 

Comparison of Performance Metrics (2022–2024):

Metric2022 (Year 1)2023 (Year 2)2024 (Year 3)Notes on Changes
Overall APR Score66.5%55.3%61.0%Represents the total percentage of points earned out of all possible points. Improvement from 2023 to 2024.
Performance Points Earned51.4%33.5%44.6%Reflects achievement in academic performance and growth metrics. Significant improvement in 2024.
Continuous Improvement Score92.3%92.3%86.6%Measures adherence to plans, climate surveys, and operational standards. Consistently strong performance.
Academic Growth (Math)66.7%25.0%75.0%Evaluates year-to-year progress in Mathematics proficiency. Marked improvement in 2024.
Academic Growth (ELA)62.5%15.8%25.0%Evaluates year-to-year progress in English Language Arts proficiency. Gradual recovery in 2024.
Success-Ready Students0.0%0.0%0.0%Measures preparedness for high school, including readiness metrics. Persistent challenge; needs focus.

Strengths:

  1. Overall Performance Recovery: After a decline in 2023, our overall APR score increased in 2024, driven by improvements in performance metrics.
  2. Mathematics Academic Growth: Growth scores in Mathematics surged from 25% in 2023 to 75% in 2024, now rated “On-Track.”
  3. Continuous Improvement: Sustained strong performance in areas such as the Improvement Plan (100%) and Climate and Culture Surveys (100%).

Challenges:

  1. English Language Arts Growth: While there was a slight recovery in 2024, growth remains in the “Emerging” range.
  2. Success-Ready Students: The K-8 High School Readiness score continues to fall short, reflecting the need for enhanced transition programs.
  3. Attendance and ICAP Points: Both areas scored 0% in 2024, though ICAP results are currently under appeal. ICAP (Individual Career and Academic Plan) points measure how well a school implements personalized planning tools to help students set and achieve educational and career goals. These points assess whether schools are equipping students with the guidance and resources to prepare for postsecondary success through tailored academic and career pathways. Meeting the state’s 90/90 attendance metric—where 90% of students must be in attendance at least 90% of the time—remains a significant challenge for urban schools like North Side Community School and we must continue to persist in our efforts to improve attendance. Many of our students face systemic barriers, including transportation issues, housing instability, and health-related challenges, which disproportionately impact attendance rates. 

Recommendations:

  1. Targeted Academic Interventions:

    • Continue and consider expanding high-dosage tutoring and professional development focused on ELA and Science.
    • Leverage successful Math interventions as a model for other subjects.
  2. Enhance Readiness Initiatives:

    • Strengthen middle-to-high school transition programs.
    • Introduce mentorship or career exploration activities to bolster student preparedness.
  3. Improve Attendance and Engagement:

    • Continue with campaigns to address attendance barriers and identify/employ comprehensive, community-focused solutions to support families and reduce absenteeism.
    • Continue developing family partnerships to ensure consistent student attendance.

Results

Some of North Side’s greatest successes have to do with advancing the attitudes, behaviors, and habits of our scholars. The scope of these sometimes transformative shifts isn’t always reflected in test scores. An average test score can be outstanding when viewed in the context of a child’s past scores or life experiences. 

At North Side, it’s about doing your personal best. The school faculty and staff hold themselves to this same standard. As our culture has developed, a pattern of outstanding measurable results has emerged.

MAP Results

Guide to Interpreting MAP Results

North Side scholars outperform their peers year after year on Missouri’s annual standardized testing, known as MAP testing. Our MAP results are one strong piece of evidence illustrating that scholars are learning above and beyond expectations at North Side.

Due to the pandemic there were no state standardized tests in 2020. The charts below offer visual proof of the outstanding performance of North Side scholars in 2019 compared to nearby public schools (top chart), their peers* at elementary schools in St. Louis County’s top-performing district (middle), and other top-performing charter schools in St. Louis (bottom).

 

North Side Community School’s (NSCS) Missouri Assessment Program Performance Index (MPI) scores highlight its position currently as a mid-tier performer among St. Louis charter schools while consistent outperformance compared to St. Louis Public Schools (SLPS). Here’s a detailed analysis:


ELA Performance

All Students

  • North Side Community School (350.7) outperformed SLPS (333.8) by 16.9 points, indicating stronger overall performance in English Language Arts (ELA).
  • NSCS ranked 8th out of 14 schools, outperforming SLPS and several other charter schools like Lift for Life Academy (324.0) and The Leadership School (318.0).
  • Top-performing schools, such as Lafayette Preparatory Academy (434.0) and The Soulard School (405.8), set a high benchmark, revealing room for NSCS to improve its overall ELA performance.

Student Group

  • NSCS (355.0) scored higher than SLPS (320.5) by 34.5 points, demonstrating its strength in instruction and interventions for specific student groups.
  • NSCS ranked 6th out of 14 schools, surpassing other charter schools like Lift for Life Academy (323.8) and KIPP St. Louis (328.5).
  • The school’s stronger performance with student groups highlights its ability to move students from “below basic” or “basic” levels to “proficient” or “advanced,” which carries more weight in the MPI calculation.

Math Performance

All Students

  • NSCS (320.9) outperformed SLPS (300.8) by 20.1 points, reflecting stronger performance in math instruction compared to SLPS.
  • NSCS ranked 6th out of 14 schools, outperforming charter schools like Momentum Academy (316.9) and Premier Charter School (316.5), as well as SLPS, which ranks near the bottom.
  • Top-performing schools like Lafayette Preparatory Academy (417.7) and Gateway Science Academy (380.9) outpace NSCS significantly, revealing areas for growth.

Student Group

  • NSCS (320.5) outscored SLPS (284.8) by 35.7 points, further widening the gap compared to the “All Students” category.
  • NSCS ranked 5th out of 14 schools, showing a strong focus on improving math outcomes for targeted groups.
  • This reflects NSCS’s ability to address the harder challenge of moving students from “below basic” and “basic” levels to higher achievement levels.

How NSCS Compares to SLPS

  1. Better Overall Performance:

    • NSCS consistently outperforms SLPS in both ELA and Math, with significant gaps for both “All Students” and “Student Groups.”
    • The difference in scores is particularly notable for student groups, where NSCS outperforms SLPS by 34.5 points in ELA and 35.7 points in Math.
  2. Effective Targeted Interventions:

    • The wider performance gap in Student Group scores shows NSCS excels at implementing effective strategies for students requiring additional support, a critical area where SLPS struggles.
  3. Focus on Hard-to-Reach Students:

    • SLPS faces greater challenges in lifting students from “below basic” and “basic” levels to higher levels, reflected in its lower MPI scores. NSCS demonstrates stronger results in this area, likely due to its smaller class sizes and individualized instruction.
  4. Math as a Strength:

    • NSCS demonstrates particularly strong performance in Math compared to SLPS, out-scoring it by 20.1 points in All Students and 35.7 points in Student Groups. This indicates effective numeracy interventions that could serve as a model for SLPS.
  5. Competitive Alternative to SLPS:

    • NSCS offers a viable, competitive option for families seeking alternatives to SLPS, particularly for those prioritizing smaller class sizes, restorative practices, and targeted academic interventions.

How NSCS Compares to Other Charter Schools

  1. Mid-Tier Positioning:

    • NSCS ranks in the middle among charter schools, with opportunities to improve ELA and Math scores to compete with top performers like Lafayette Preparatory Academy and Gateway Science Academy.
  2. Strengths with Student Groups:

    • NSCS ranks higher in Student Group scores than in All Students for both ELA and Math, showing its focused interventions yield measurable results.
  3. Room for Growth:

    • To compete with leading schools, NSCS must continue prioritizing efforts to move more students from “basic” to “proficient” and “advanced” levels, particularly in ELA, where the gap with top schools is more pronounced.

Action Points for NSCS

  • Targeted ELA Improvement: Strengthen interventions to close the gap with leading schools like Lafayette Preparatory Academy, particularly for “All Students” in ELA.
  • Sustain Math Gains: Build on existing successes in Math to further widen the gap over SLPS and move closer to top charter schools.
  • Focus on Below-Grade-Level Students: Continue emphasizing strategies to move students out of “below basic” and “basic” levels, which carry the greatest weight in the MPI calculation.

*The Super Subgroup consists of all students classified in any of the following categories: Black, Hispanic, IEP, ELL, qualifies for free/reduced lunch

MAP testing is not the only tool North Side uses to measure a student’s learning. We always look at a variety of indicators to improve students’ educational experiences.